This is part of the Left’s judicial insurrection against the United States.

A gold-standard guide used by judges nationwide to address subjects they are not particularly versed in is drawing criticism over the latest edition’s inclusion of purported ideological bias focused on its climate section.

Critics have said the fourth edition of the Federal Judicial Center’s Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence – which includes a foreword by Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan – appears to blur the line between neutrally educating judges and indoctrinating them with left-wing advocates’ prose.

The approximately 1,600-page guide was released at the beginning of the year and includes several citations and footnotes to climate change activists and proponents, including climatologist Michael Mann and environmental law expert Jessica Wentz.

The climate agenda is losing ground in elections due to its exorbitant costs and impracticality in everyday life. As a result, advocates are shifting to the courts to inflate the prices of our key energy supplies through lawsuits. Organizations, like the Climate Judiciary Project (CJP) and Environmental Law Institute, are actively influencing or even indoctrinating judges with misleading climate information to tilt rulings in their direction, need to be stopped.

This isn’t law, its lawfare and judges ought to remain impartial rather than acting as advocates. This is crucial. Once the justice system abandons neutrality, it harms us all.

During a hearing of a Senate Judiciary Subcommittee hearing last year, Senator Ted Cruz revealed the Left’s effort to manipulate climate-related lawsuits receiving financial support for China.