Environmentalists: Biden Climate Plan Allows for Fossil Fuels

Biden attacks and even shuts down fossil fuel production in the United States but wants to finance it overseas. No doubt the biggest beneficiary will be China.

Environmentalists say Biden’s climate finance plan leaves the door open for fossil fuels

by Abby Smith, Energy and Environment Reporter | April 29, 2021 11:00 PM, Washington Examiner

President Joe Biden isn’t pledging nearly as much money to help developing countries grapple with climate change as he is promising to boost domestic efforts to curb emissions.

The gulf between Biden’s domestic commitments and his promises abroad has many environmentalists saying the White House’s first international climate finance plan, unveiled on April 22 during Biden’s climate summit, is underwhelming.

In the plan, Biden commits to double U.S. climate finance to developing countries by 2024 and to triple funding to help poorer nations adapt to climate damages, compared with funding levels during the Obama administration.

However, that doubling of overseas climate funding has already been achieved by countries in Europe and by China in the last four years while the Trump administration sat on the sidelines of global climate finance discussions, said Joe Thwaites, an associate in the World Resources Institute’s Sustainable Finance Center.

Biden’s plan also doesn’t fully close the door on financing for fossil fuels overseas, instead simply encouraging agencies to scale back investments in “carbon intensive” fossil fuel projects in favor of clean energy. The United Kingdom, meanwhile, has already pledged to end all overseas fossil fuel financing.

In addition, Biden’s plan skips directives to one of the U.S. government’s most prominent funders of fossil fuels overseas, the Export-Import Bank.

“It’s one tiny step when we need 10 leaps forward,” said Kate DeAngelis, a senior international policy analyst at Friends of the Earth. “If we don’t see a lot more action to follow up on this, especially announcements from these other agencies, then I think it’s going to be barely different than business as usual.”

DeAngelis said she wants to see concrete commitments to exit fossil fuels from the Ex-Im Bank and development entities such as the U.S. Trade and Development Agency and the Millennium Challenge Corporation.

FULL ARTICLE

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s