During April 2025, President Donald Trump dismissed 400 so-called climate experts tasked with preparing the National Climate Assessment. Not surprisingly, the drive by media and climate cultists were not happy.

The report, known as the National Climate Assessment, is a major publication produced every four years that summarizes the impacts of climate change in the United States, and it is congressionally mandated under the Global Change Research Act of 1990. The sixth edition is scheduled for publication in 2027 and preparations have been underway for months to meet that deadline.

The National Climate Assessment is the basis for which federal, state, and local governments, as well as private companies, can prepare for climate change impacts, understand future projections of climate risk, as well as learn to adapt and mitigate those challenges.

An email sent to participants from the deputy director of services of the U.S. Global Change Research Program, a federal office that organizes the publication of the report read, “Thank you for your participation in the 6th National Climate Assessment … we are now releasing all current assessment participants from their roles.”

“The Trump administration has dismissed all the scientists from their work on the nation’s most important climate change report,” Steven Hamburg, chief scientist at the Environmental Defense Fund, said in a statement. “Refusing to study climate change won’t make it go away — or help us deal with stronger storms, droughts, floods, wildfires and hotter temperatures, or help us stop emitting the pollution that is making it worse.”

Energy Secretary Chris Wright ordered a new climate assessment report, titled A Critical Review of Impacts of Greenhouse Gas Emissions on the U.S. Climate, to be completed ahead of the 2027 schedule. This balanced report examines the science and economics of climate change, citing studies that suggest carbon dioxide-driven warming may have a less severe economic impact than claimed by media and activist scientists. It also warns that aggressive climate mitigation could cause more harm than good and notes that U.S. policies are likely to have little impact on global climate.

The report was authored by a five-member team: climatologists Dr. John Christy and Dr. Judith Curry, theoretical physicist Dr. Steven Koonin, economist Dr. Ross McKitrick, and meteorologist/climate scientist Dr. Roy Spencer.

The best indication that report is obviously credible is that mainstream media outlets are panicked saying it is …. disinformation.

Less than two months after joining the Department of Energy, they produced a 141-page report that often conflicts with and distorts the consensus view of climate scientists to support President Donald Trump’s effort to repeal the endangerment finding, the scientific underpinning for greenhouse gas rules on carmakers, energy companies and other industries.

…In a prologue to the report, Energy Secretary Chris Wright wrote that he intentionally assembled a “diverse team of independent experts” who were chosen for “their rigor, honesty, and willingness to elevate the debate.” That team did not include any of the hundreds of government climate scientists from NOAA or NASA, two of the world’s leading science agencies.

The problem is that the media, so-called experts, and government scientists destroyed their credibility during the COVID outbreak, spreading disinformation themselves. Additionally, the internet is full of their failed predictions, revealing that the only real climate crisis is a politically driven one, fabricated by Democrats.

The new climate assessment will serve as a crucial foundation for informed decision-making, balancing the nation’s energy and economic priorities with legitimate environmental concerns. This marks a minor victory for science and a major triumph for the American public.

PHOTO CREDIT: The Forrestal Building – By US Department of Energy – http://www.energy.gov/, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=6239456